Ripple case nears conclusion, but the fight for clarity must ‘continue’ – Brad Garlinghouse

Ripple case nears conclusion, but the fight for clarity must 'continue' – Brad Garlinghouse
Ledger



Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has warned that as Ripple’s authorized battle towards the United States monetary watchdog is coming “to a close,” it’s only the starting of a bigger battle for the trade, and the fight for regulatory clarity “has to proceed.”

Following the Hinman Documents being unsealed on June 13 as part of the ongoing lawsuit between Ripple and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Garlinghouse published a video on Twitter to discuss the lawsuit’s timeline and express his frustration with the SEC.

Published on June 17, Garlinghouse said in the video that the now-public Hinman documents suggest that the SEC “knowingly created confusion about the rules, and they used that confusion through enforcement.”

In his remarks, Garlinghouse strongly criticized the SEC actions describing them as a transparent case of “bad faith, plain and simple.” 

itrust

He believes this perspective was current from the very starting of the lawsuit towards Ripple, which was initially filed in December 2020, saying it felt like a “very grinch-like touch,” to file the case simply “days before christmas.”

“This is the definition of putting politics over people […] and the pursuit of power over sound policy” he said.

Garlinghouse defined that previous to the lawsuit being filed he answered “each query [the SEC] had” and it was never suggested to him that XRP was a security.

He believes that the SEC is “trying to kill” innovation and the cryptocurrency industry in the U.S, arguing that the Hinman Speech isn’t about “any one token or any one blockchain,” but more so the overall stance that the SEC has towards the crypto industry.

“This is about showing the extent to which the SEC has relentlessly enforced action against crypto players, while professing fake open arms and calls to come in and register, all the while lying about their so-called guidance.”

Garlinghouse further explained that “at best,” the documents suggest that SEC senior officials “couldn’t agree” on the law and told Bill Hinman directly that “he would confuse the public even more about the rules for crypto.”

Cointelegraph reported on June 13 that notes in the revealed documents suggested that the editors were concerned that Hinman stating Ether is not a security, may make it “difficult for the agency to take a different position on Ether in the future.”

However, Garlinghouse stated that “at worst” the documents showed that Hinman “deliberately ignored the law” and tried to “create new laws.”

Related: Ripple welcomes MiCA regulation as US lawsuit highlights lack of clarity

He emphasised that the trade must work collectively as the SEC may take motion towards extra crypto corporations in the future.

“Ultimately as our law suit comes to a close, for so many othersits just starting, so the fight for clarity has to continue” he said.

This comes after the SEC filed a lawsuit towards crypto change Binance on June 5, for allegedly providing unregistered securities. A day later, the regulator took motion towards Coinbase on similiar grounds.

Magazine: Gary Gensler’s job in danger, BlackRock’s first spot Bitcoin ETF and different information: Hodler’s Digest, June 11-17





Source link

[wp-stealth-ads rows="2" mobile-rows="3"]
Blockcard